Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Bill to increase investment in science, technology, and communications research and development.
The problem
U.S. scientific competitiveness may lag in emerging technologies. More funding for research could strengthen innovation capacity.
The proposal
Allocates federal funding for science and technology initiatives, communications infrastructure, and research programs.
The impact
Scientists, researchers, tech companies, and universities receive increased support. Taxpayers fund the programs. Communities may benefit from improved infrastructure.
Increased funding helps researchers develop new technologies. This can create competitive advantages in global markets. Strong science investment leads to breakthrough discoveries.
Research funding supports positions for scientists, engineers, and technical workers. Universities and labs expand hiring. These jobs typically pay well.
Investment in technology infrastructure can enhance broadband access. Rural and underserved areas may gain better connectivity. Stronger networks benefit businesses and individuals.
Federal support helps U.S. researchers compete internationally. Strong research capacity supports economic and security interests.
The bill requires taxpayer funding for new programs. Federal spending adds to the national budget. Costs may strain government finances.
Government programs don't always use money effectively. Some funding might support research without practical applications. Oversight and accountability are important concerns.
Research funding often concentrates in major universities and urban centers. Rural areas and smaller institutions may receive less support. This can widen regional economic gaps.
Scientific breakthroughs take years to develop. Benefits may not appear quickly. Taxpayers may not see short-term returns.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.