Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires federal government to use safer and smarter practices when purchasing goods and services.
The problem
Federal agencies may not follow consistent standards when buying supplies and services, potentially wasting money or purchasing inefficient products.
The proposal
Establishes new purchasing rules and standards for federal agencies to follow when buying goods and services from vendors.
The impact
Federal agencies must change buying practices. Vendors selling to government face new requirements. Taxpayers may see government spending change.
Smarter purchasing rules could help federal agencies buy better products at lower prices. This saves taxpayer money that could be used elsewhere.
Standard rules mean all federal agencies follow the same purchasing practices. This creates fairness and reduces confusion about how government buys things.
New purchasing standards may reward companies that develop better, more efficient products. This pushes businesses to innovate and improve their goods.
Businesses selling to the government may face higher expenses meeting new requirements. Small companies might struggle more than large ones to comply.
New rules and standards could make it take longer for federal agencies to buy what they need. This bureaucracy might delay important government work.
Without specific details about what 'safe and smart' means, agencies might interpret rules differently. This could create confusion rather than consistency.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.