Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Bill addresses cybersecurity threats to mobile phone networks in the United States.
The problem
Mobile networks face growing cyber attacks and security vulnerabilities that could harm communications infrastructure and national security.
The proposal
Establishes requirements for mobile network operators to improve cybersecurity practices, standards, and reporting of security incidents.
The impact
Mobile carriers, telecom companies, and phone users are affected through new security standards and potential costs for network upgrades.
Better cybersecurity standards help prevent hacking and attacks on cell phone networks. This protects millions of Americans who rely on mobile communications daily.
Required incident reporting helps government and companies detect threats faster. Quick detection prevents larger attacks and protects sensitive data.
Securing mobile networks protects critical infrastructure from foreign adversaries. Strong networks are important for national defense and emergency response.
Better security standards reassure the public that their phone communications are protected. This builds trust in mobile services.
Mobile carriers must spend money upgrading security systems and hiring experts. These costs might be passed to consumers through higher phone bills.
Smaller telecom companies may struggle to meet new standards due to limited resources. Compliance could be difficult and expensive for regional providers.
Without detailed rules in the bill, companies may struggle knowing exactly what to do. Vague requirements could lead to uneven security across different carriers.
Increased security monitoring and incident reporting could affect user privacy. Companies collecting more data raises questions about information protection.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.