Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Strengthens penalties for immigrants convicted of DUI offenses.
The problem
Deaths and injuries from impaired drivers have prompted calls for stricter consequences, particularly for non-citizen offenders convicted of driving under the influence.
The proposal
The bill likely enhances criminal penalties, deportation provisions, or enforcement measures targeting non-citizens convicted of DUI or related driving offenses.
The impact
Non-citizen individuals, immigration courts, law enforcement agencies, and communities affected by drunk driving incidents would be impacted by changes to DUI enforcement and penalties.
Stricter consequences for impaired drivers may deter dangerous behavior and reduce drunk driving incidents. Increased penalties could protect communities from preventable accidents and injuries caused by impaired operation of vehicles.
Establishing clear penalties for non-citizen offenders creates uniform legal standards. This ensures similar cases are treated similarly across jurisdictions and immigration courts.
Named after victims of DUI incidents, the bill acknowledges harm caused by impaired driving. This honors those affected and demonstrates legislative commitment to preventing similar tragedies.
Enhanced penalties may disproportionately affect non-citizen populations through deportation or detention. Critics argue this treats non-citizens more harshly than citizens for similar offenses, raising fairness questions.
Targeting non-citizens specifically does not address drunk driving by citizens, who constitute the majority of DUI offenses nationally. The bill may not significantly reduce overall drunk driving rates.
Additional DUI cases could overwhelm already backlogged immigration courts and detention facilities. This may increase government costs and processing delays for all immigration cases.
Stricter automatic penalties may limit judicial discretion in sentencing. Some argue this prevents consideration of individual circumstances and could conflict with constitutional due process protections.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.