Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Requires DHS to monitor and report on foreign influence in research and development activities.
The problem
Foreign governments and entities may compromise sensitive research at U.S. institutions through espionage, talent recruitment, and unauthorized technology transfer, threatening national security.
The proposal
The bill establishes accountability measures requiring the Department of Homeland Security to track foreign research activities, create reporting requirements, and implement security protocols at DHS research facilities.
The impact
Universities, research institutions, and DHS labs must follow new security procedures. International researchers may face increased scrutiny. U.S. research competitiveness and collaboration could be affected.
Helps prevent foreign governments from stealing important scientific discoveries and military technology. Strengthens national security by monitoring who accesses sensitive research programs.
Establishes transparent procedures for tracking research security. Gives institutions clear guidelines about protecting information and reporting suspicious activity.
Requires DHS to document and report on their research security efforts. Makes it easier to find problems and fix weaknesses in the system.
Universities and labs must spend money and staff time on new reporting requirements. Smaller institutions may struggle to comply with complex procedures.
Increased scrutiny of foreign researchers could discourage international partnerships. U.S. research might lose access to talented scientists from other countries.
Monitoring research activities raises questions about researcher privacy. Foreign nationals may be unfairly targeted based on national origin.
DHS needs funding and personnel to create monitoring systems and review reports. May divert resources from other security priorities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.