Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Bill requiring organizations to report foreign funding given to schools and universities.
The problem
Schools may receive money from foreign sources without clear public disclosure, raising concerns about foreign influence on American education.
The proposal
Requires educational institutions to report and make public any contributions from foreign governments, entities, or individuals above certain amounts.
The impact
Schools, universities, foreign donors, and parents affected through increased transparency requirements and potential funding restrictions.
The bill makes it easier for parents and taxpayers to see where education funding comes from. This allows communities to understand potential foreign influence on their schools. Transparency can help build public trust in educational institutions.
Reporting requirements help identify potential security risks or concerning patterns in foreign funding. This allows policymakers to understand which countries are investing in American education. It supports informed decision-making about international relationships.
Public disclosure prevents unfair advantages where some schools receive hidden foreign support. All institutions must follow the same reporting rules. This creates equal treatment across educational organizations.
Schools must spend time and money tracking and reporting foreign contributions. Smaller institutions may struggle with compliance costs. Administrative overhead increases without additional resources provided.
Foreign funding may decline if disclosure requirements make donors uncomfortable. This could reduce international research partnerships and scholarships for students. Schools with global programs might lose valuable support.
The bill's language may be unclear about what counts as 'foreign' or 'adversarial' contributions. Enforcement could be inconsistent across different institutions. Schools may struggle with proper classification of borderline cases.
Public disclosure of donor information may expose individuals to privacy issues. Some international academics or scholarship providers may avoid involvement due to privacy worries. This could reduce beneficial international educational connections.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.