Latest action: Received in the Senate.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Congress votes to reject a federal rule protecting the San Francisco Bay-Delta longfin smelt fish.
The problem
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service created a rule listing the San Francisco Bay-Delta longfin smelt as endangered. Some believe this endangers water projects and agriculture in California.
The proposal
This bill uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove the Fish and Wildlife Service rule that protects the longfin smelt as endangered.
The impact
Fish protection efforts could stop. California water users, farmers, and environmental groups would be affected differently depending on the rule's outcome.
Disapproving the rule could allow California's water projects and farms to operate with fewer environmental limits. This may provide more water to cities and agricultural areas.
Agricultural operations in California could benefit from less strict environmental rules. This might lower costs for farmers and water management.
The bill asserts that Congress should review and potentially reject federal agency rules. This prevents agencies from acting without legislative oversight.
Without protection, the longfin smelt population could decline toward extinction. This would permanently lose a native California fish species.
The smelt is part of San Francisco Bay's ecosystem. Its disappearance could damage other species and the overall health of the bay.
Rejecting species protections makes it easier to ignore other endangered species. This sets a precedent that may weaken the Endangered Species Act.
Environmental groups could sue to block this disapproval, leading to costly court battles. Courts may rule the disapproval unconstitutional.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.