Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to reduce fish caught unintentionally in commercial fishing operations.
The problem
Commercial fishing nets catch non-target fish species, damaging marine ecosystems and wasting fish populations that die without being used.
The proposal
Establishes requirements for fishing gear modifications, reporting standards, and practices to minimize unintended fish catches in U.S. waters.
The impact
Affects commercial fishing industry, marine ecosystems, coastal communities, and seafood consumers through new regulations and enforcement.
Reducing bycatch helps endangered and threatened fish species survive and recover. It protects ocean biodiversity and ecosystem health. Fewer fish die unnecessarily from fishing operations.
Less bycatch means more fish remain in the ocean to reproduce. This supports long-term fishing industry sustainability. Healthier fish stocks benefit future generations of fishermen.
Many bycaught fish are discarded and wasted. Reducing bycatch means less waste and more efficient use of ocean resources. This aligns with conservation goals.
Encourages fishing practices that are environmentally conscious. Helps U.S. fisheries meet international conservation standards. Improves industry reputation with consumers.
Fishermen may need to buy new equipment or modify existing nets. Training and reporting requirements create additional expenses. Small fishing operations could face financial hardship.
New restrictions might limit the amount of target fish fishermen can catch. This could decrease profits and income for fishing communities. Some fishing jobs might be at risk.
New reporting and monitoring requirements add paperwork and complexity. Enforcement costs increase for government agencies. Compliance may be difficult for remote or smaller operations.
Large fishing companies may adapt more easily than small family operations. Different fishing regions face different challenges with implementation. Some areas may be affected more severely than others.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.