Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Expands which schools near military bases can receive Department of Defense priority funding and support.
The problem
Some schools serving military families near bases are excluded from a Defense Department program that provides funding and resources to public schools on or adjacent to military installations.
The proposal
The bill directs the Secretary of Defense to expand the priority list for schools eligible under the Public Schools on Military Installations Program to include additional schools.
The impact
Military families and schools near bases could gain access to more federal funding and resources. The Defense Department's budget for school support may be stretched across more schools.
Expanding the priority list means more public schools serving military families could receive federal funding and educational support. This helps schools with higher concentrations of military-connected students access needed resources.
Military families often move frequently and face unique challenges. Expanding school eligibility ensures more students in military households receive consistent educational support regardless of location.
Better schools near bases can improve quality of life for service members. This may improve recruitment and retention by making military family life more stable and appealing.
Some schools near military installations may be excluded from current programs due to administrative boundaries. Expanding the list could correct unfair geographic gaps in funding eligibility.
If the program's funding stays the same while serving more schools, each school may receive less support. This dilutes benefits for currently eligible schools.
The bill doesn't specify how expanded eligibility would be funded. Congress may need to increase Defense Department education budgets to avoid reducing support for existing participants.
The bill doesn't explain what schools would be added to the priority list or by what standards. This vagueness makes it hard to predict actual effects.
Expanding the program requires the Defense Department to review and potentially reclassify many schools. This increases bureaucratic work and implementation costs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.