Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Proposes a constitutional amendment to ban non-citizens from voting in any U.S. elections.
The problem
Some people are concerned non-citizens may be voting in federal, state, or local elections. Current laws already prohibit this, but supporters want it in the Constitution.
The proposal
Adds language to the Constitution explicitly stating only U.S. citizens can vote in federal, state, and local elections. Requires state ratification to pass.
The impact
Would legally reinforce existing voting restrictions. Affects non-citizens, election administrators, and voting eligibility standards nationwide.
Makes voting eligibility explicit in the Constitution rather than relying on laws. Provides a clear legal foundation that cannot be easily changed without amendment.
Supporters argue it protects the principle that voting is a right reserved for citizens. Reinforces the connection between citizenship and political participation.
Proponents believe it strengthens election security by establishing a clear citizenship requirement. May provide additional legal tools to verify voter eligibility.
Federal and state laws already prohibit non-citizen voting. A constitutional amendment may be redundant since existing rules already enforce this.
Constitutional amendments require approval from two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of state legislatures. This lengthy process uses significant legislative resources.
Critics worry implementation could lead to stricter voter ID requirements affecting certain groups. May create barriers for eligible citizens if verification becomes too strict.
Documented cases of non-citizen voting are extremely rare. Critics question whether constitutional change is necessary for an uncommon problem.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10841
Securing Elections From AI Deception Act
HRES 1629
Expressing support for the designation of the third Wednesday of October, as "Support Your Local Chamber of Commerce Day".
S 5687
Presidential Pardon Integrity Act
S 5684
No Cash for Incompetent and Malicious Contractors Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.