Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Proposes a constitutional amendment allowing Congress and states to regulate campaign money and create public financing systems.
The problem
The Supreme Court has limited campaign finance regulations based on free speech protections. Many believe this allows unlimited money in politics, giving wealthy donors outsized influence over elections.
The proposal
This constitutional amendment would give Congress and state governments the power to set rules on campaign contributions and spending. It would also allow creation of public financing systems where government funds campaigns.
The impact
Politicians, donors, voters, and election systems would be affected. This could change how campaigns are funded and limit the money available for political advertising and activities.
Limits the power of rich individuals and corporations to dominate elections through large donations. Could give ordinary voters more equal say in elections.
Enables systems where government funds campaigns instead of private donors. Could free politicians from spending time fundraising.
Lets states create their own campaign finance rules tailored to local needs. Different communities could choose different systems.
Public funding could help candidates without wealthy connections run for office. Could enable more diverse perspectives in government.
Restricting money in campaigns may limit political speech protections. Some argue spending money on political ads is a form of free speech.
Strict limits could help politicians already in office stay in power. Challengers might struggle to get their message out.
Public financing systems require taxpayer money to fund campaigns. Costs could be substantial depending on the system design.
Money might flow to campaigns through independent groups or other workarounds. Enforcement could be complicated and costly.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10841
Securing Elections From AI Deception Act
HRES 1629
Expressing support for the designation of the third Wednesday of October, as "Support Your Local Chamber of Commerce Day".
S 5687
Presidential Pardon Integrity Act
S 5684
No Cash for Incompetent and Malicious Contractors Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
INFIN, A FINANCIAL SERVICES ALLIANCE (F/K/A FINANCIAL SERVICE CENTERS AMERICA)
via HUDSON COOK, LLP
…ederal regulation of interest rates on financial products, including: H.J.Res.122 - Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer…
Q1 2025 total
all issues
AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM
via AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM
…olar Panel Fraud & Consumer Protections Sunlight on Solar Lending Act H. J. Res 122 Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer…
Q2 2025 total
all issues
Firms whose LDA filings mention this bill. One filing covers many bills — read as disclosed interest, not confirmed lobbying on this bill alone. Dollar amounts are each filer's total reported lobbying money for that reporting period across every issue in the filing. No public data breaks lobbying spending out by bill, so none of these figures is the amount spent on this bill.
Verify these filings on the Senate LDA database