Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a task force to research oysters, clams, and mussels on the East Coast.
The problem
East Coast shellfish populations face threats from disease, pollution, and climate change. Better research is needed to protect these important marine resources and the fishing industry.
The proposal
Establishes an East Coast Bivalve Research Task Force to study oyster, clam, and mussel populations. The task force will coordinate research and develop strategies to protect these shellfish.
The impact
Shellfish harvesters, coastal communities, and marine ecosystems are affected. The task force may improve shellfish health and support the seafood industry through better scientific understanding.
Research can identify threats to shellfish populations and help restore them. Healthy shellfish populations support coastal ecosystems and marine biodiversity. This benefits future generations.
Better research helps shellfish harvesters make informed decisions and improve harvests. The fishing industry provides jobs and food for coastal communities. Science-based management can sustain these livelihoods.
A task force brings together scientists, government agencies, and industry experts. Coordination reduces duplication and makes research more efficient. This pooled effort produces better results.
Establishing a new task force requires federal funding and staff time. Taxpayers must pay for salaries, research, and administrative costs. Budget impacts depend on funding levels not specified in the bill.
The task force focuses only on East Coast bivalves, leaving other regions unaddressed. Some shellfish populations on the West Coast and Gulf Coast may need similar research. This creates uneven protection.
The bill summary does not detail what power the task force has to actually help shellfish. Research without authority to implement changes may have limited real-world impact. Results depend on how recommendations are used.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.