Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill about workers' ability to compete in job market without restrictions.
The problem
Workers may face legal barriers or agreements that prevent them from competing for jobs or starting businesses in their field.
The proposal
Removes or limits restrictions that prevent workers from competing for employment or business opportunities after leaving a job.
The impact
Workers gain freedom to compete for jobs. Employers may lose protection against employees joining competitors or starting rival businesses.
Employees can move to competing companies or start their own businesses without legal barriers. This gives workers more freedom and bargaining power in the job market.
Businesses face more competition, which can drive innovation and lower prices for consumers. New startups can enter markets more easily.
Skilled workers can move where their talents are needed most. This helps match workers with jobs efficiently across the economy.
Workers avoid expensive court battles over non-compete agreements. Businesses spend less enforcing restrictions on employee movement.
Companies lose ability to protect confidential information and trade secrets when employees move to competitors. This could harm small businesses most.
Employers may reduce training investments if trained workers immediately join competitors. This could hurt worker development long-term.
Companies may need to spend more on security, legal protection, and higher wages to retain talent. These costs could be passed to consumers.
New companies may struggle competing against established firms with deep resources. The advantage may only benefit well-capitalized competitors.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.