Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates federal programs to help defend against cyberattacks using artificial intelligence technology.
The problem
Cyberattacks threaten government and private computer systems. Existing defenses may not keep pace with rapidly evolving threats.
The proposal
Establishes AI-based cybersecurity initiatives, coordination between agencies, and likely funding for research and defensive systems development.
The impact
Government agencies, private tech companies, and critical infrastructure operators gain new AI defense tools. Cybersecurity workers may see new job opportunities.
AI can detect and respond to cyberattacks faster than humans. This protects government data, financial systems, and private information from theft or damage.
New programs create demand for cybersecurity experts and AI researchers. This generates employment in high-paying technology jobs.
Bill likely improves how government agencies share threat information. Better coordination strengthens national security responses.
Funding for AI cybersecurity research helps American technology companies stay competitive globally and develop new defensive capabilities.
New programs require federal funding, which increases government spending. This money could be used elsewhere or reduce budget deficits.
Extensive AI monitoring systems could collect data on citizens. People may worry about government surveillance and privacy violations.
AI systems can make mistakes or have built-in biases. False alarms might cause unnecessary responses; biased systems might fail to detect real threats.
Government agencies may struggle to adopt new AI systems quickly. Technical complexity and training requirements could delay benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.