Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates separate federal pay areas for Orlando and Tampa government workers.
The problem
Federal employees in Orlando and Tampa may be grouped with distant areas, affecting their pay calculations and not reflecting local cost-of-living differences in these metropolitan regions.
The proposal
Directs the President's Pay Agent to establish Orlando and Tampa as separate federal pay localities for determining federal employee compensation.
The impact
Federal employees in Orlando and Tampa would have pay adjusted based on their local area. Government budgets in these regions would be affected. Local economies could see changes in federal worker spending.
Federal employees in Orlando and Tampa would receive pay adjusted to their actual local cost of living rather than being grouped with distant areas. This could reduce pay inequities and improve employee retention in these specific metropolitan areas.
Creates a more accurate system for determining what federal workers earn in these regions. Recognizes that Orlando and Tampa have distinct housing costs, expenses, and economic conditions.
Federal employees earning appropriate local pay may spend more in their communities, potentially benefiting local businesses and the regional economy.
Improved pay alignment could help attract and retain federal workers in these metropolitan areas, ensuring government services continue smoothly.
Creating separate pay localities could increase federal payroll costs if Orlando and Tampa receive higher pay adjustments. This means more federal spending in these regions.
Adding more federal pay localities requires additional administrative work and coordination by the Pay Agent, potentially increasing government overhead costs.
Other metropolitan areas might argue they also deserve separate pay localities, creating pressure for more adjustments and potentially causing inconsistent treatment across similar regions.
Without official analysis, it is unclear exactly how much pay would change or what the total cost would be to taxpayers and the federal government.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.