Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to protect and strengthen the Clean Water Act.
The problem
Water pollution from industrial discharge, agricultural runoff, and other sources threatens public health and environmental quality across American watersheds.
The proposal
The bill likely proposes amendments to Clean Water Act enforcement, pollution standards, or regulatory authority, though specific provisions cannot be determined without the full text.
The impact
States, industries, municipalities, and citizens would face changes in water quality regulation, compliance requirements, and environmental protection standards.
Strengthening water protection rules helps ensure drinking water safety for millions of Americans. Clean water reduces waterborne diseases and health risks from contaminated sources.
Enhanced Clean Water Act protections support recovery of polluted rivers, lakes, and coastal areas. This preserves ecosystems and aquatic life for future generations.
Preventing water pollution reduces costs for water treatment and environmental cleanup. Cleaner waterways support fishing, tourism, and recreational industries.
Federal Clean Water protections establish uniform standards across states. This prevents a race-to-the-bottom where states compete by lowering environmental rules.
Stricter regulations increase expenses for manufacturers, power plants, and agricultural operations. Small businesses may struggle more with compliance costs than large corporations.
Some industries may reduce operations or relocate to reduce regulatory burden. Communities dependent on these industries could experience economic hardship.
Enhanced federal rules may limit state flexibility to manage water resources based on local conditions. States argue they understand regional water needs better than federal government.
Stricter standards require new infrastructure, monitoring systems, and enforcement resources. Small municipalities may lack funding to meet upgraded requirements.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.