Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires publishing a yearly list of dual-citizen federal employees.
The problem
Lawmakers want transparency about federal workers who hold citizenship in multiple countries, citing potential security and loyalty concerns.
The proposal
The Office of Personnel Management must publish an annual public list identifying all federal employees who are dual citizens of the United States and another country.
The impact
Dual-citizen federal workers would be publicly identified. Government transparency increases. Privacy concerns arise for affected employees.
The public would have access to information about federal workforce composition. This increases accountability and oversight of government personnel decisions.
Supporters argue identifying dual citizens helps identify potential conflicts of interest. This information could inform security clearance and sensitive position decisions.
Citizens would know more details about federal employees. This aligns with principles of transparency in government operations.
Publishing employee names and dual-citizen status could expose personal information. This raises serious privacy concerns for affected workers and their families.
Public lists could enable discrimination against dual citizens in hiring, promotion, or workplace treatment. This may violate equal opportunity principles.
Fear of public identification might discourage qualified dual-citizen candidates from federal service. This could harm workforce diversity and talent recruitment.
Dual citizenship alone does not indicate security risk or disloyalty. The list could stigmatize citizens based on a flawed premise.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.