Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires appliance makers to label how long their products are expected to last.
The problem
Consumers lack clear information about appliance durability when shopping. Manufacturers don't consistently disclose estimated product lifespan, making it hard to compare value.
The proposal
Appliance manufacturers must attach labels showing estimated performance life. This gives shoppers information about how long appliances should work.
The impact
Consumers get better purchasing information. Manufacturers must add labeling. Potentially changes buying decisions based on durability and long-term value.
Consumers can compare appliances by durability, not just price. This helps people make smarter purchases that save money over time by lasting longer.
Manufacturers may build better appliances if they must publicly label durability. This could improve overall product quality in the market.
People who know appliance lifespans might keep them longer. Fewer discarded appliances means less trash going to landfills.
Labeling requirements make manufacturers honest about their products. Consumers deserve to know what they're buying.
Manufacturers must test appliances and create labels, adding expenses. These costs might get passed to consumers through higher prices.
Estimated lifespan varies based on usage and maintenance. Labels might mislead if actual durability differs from estimates.
Smaller appliance makers might struggle with testing and labeling requirements more than large companies. This could hurt competition.
Manufacturers might face lawsuits if appliances don't meet labeled durability claims. This creates legal and insurance risks.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.