Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a tax credit for breweries that donate their leftover grain to local farms.
The problem
Breweries produce spent grain as a byproduct. While useful for animal feed and farming, breweries may not donate it due to logistics and costs, leading to waste.
The proposal
Establishes an excise tax credit for breweries that donate spent grain to local agricultural use, reducing their federal beer tax liability.
The impact
Breweries get tax savings. Farmers access cheap animal feed. Local communities reduce waste. Small breweries benefit most if credit is substantial enough.
Spent grain that would be discarded gets reused as animal feed or fertilizer. This diverts waste from landfills and reduces environmental harm. Encourages circular economy practices.
Farmers receive free or cheap animal feed and soil amendments. This reduces their input costs and strengthens local agricultural communities. Builds connections between breweries and farms.
Breweries benefit from lower tax bills when they donate. This rewards companies for socially and environmentally responsible practices without requiring new regulations.
Encourages direct relationships between breweries and local farms. Keeps agricultural resources within communities rather than sending waste elsewhere.
The excise tax credit means less federal money collected from breweries. This could reduce funding available for other government programs unless offset elsewhere.
Large breweries produce more grain and can better absorb administrative costs. Small breweries might not benefit equally if the credit amount is insufficient.
The bill doesn't detail how donations would be verified or tracked. Enforcement could be difficult, and fraud risks might exist if accountability is weak.
Only helps breweries in areas with nearby farms. Urban breweries or those far from agricultural regions may see no benefit, creating geographic inequality.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.