Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science program within NOAA.
The problem
Coastal communities need better scientific research and monitoring of ocean conditions to understand environmental changes and support decision-making.
The proposal
Directs NOAA to establish and operate National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science to conduct research and provide coastal science information.
The impact
Coastal communities, scientists, and environmental managers gain access to ocean research. Taxpayers fund the new program.
Coastal cities and towns can make better decisions about protecting beaches, managing fisheries, and preparing for storms. Research centers provide data about water quality and ocean health.
The program creates jobs for scientists, researchers, and support staff at new research centers. Local economies near these centers may benefit from spending.
Better ocean science helps predict hurricanes, tsunamis, and other coastal hazards. Communities can warn residents and prepare defenses more effectively.
Research on coastal ecosystems, marine life, and pollution helps protect ocean environments. Data supports conservation efforts and environmental regulations.
Establishing new research centers costs taxpayer money. The bill does not specify funding amounts or sources for the program.
The bill provides limited information about how centers will operate, where they will be located, or what specific research they will conduct. This creates uncertainty about effectiveness.
NOAA and other agencies already conduct coastal research. New centers might duplicate existing work instead of filling actual gaps.
Building and staffing new research centers takes time. Benefits may not appear quickly, while costs begin immediately.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.