Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires police departments receiving federal grants to report on their use of automated license plate readers.
The problem
Law enforcement agencies use automated license plate readers to track vehicles, but there is limited transparency about how often they use this technology or what safeguards protect privacy.
The proposal
Police departments that get Byrne or COPS federal grant money must submit reports to the Attorney General describing their automated license plate reader programs and usage.
The impact
Police departments receiving federal grants must comply with new reporting requirements. The public and government gain better information about surveillance technology use by law enforcement.
The reporting requirement makes law enforcement surveillance more visible to the public and government officials. This allows citizens and lawmakers to understand how widespread automated license plate reader use is.
Reports to the Attorney General create a federal-level record of how state and local police use this technology. This enables better monitoring for potential misuse or privacy violations.
Collecting data on automated license plate reader use helps lawmakers understand the technology's scope and impact. This information can guide future privacy protections or regulations.
A uniform reporting system lets officials compare practices across different police departments and states. This helps identify best practices and potential problem areas.
Police departments must use staff time and resources to compile and submit detailed reports. This adds administrative costs that could redirect money from other policing activities.
The bill does not specify what information reports must contain or how detailed they should be. This could create confusion about compliance and inconsistent reporting across departments.
The bill does not explain what happens if police departments fail to report or report inaccurately. Without clear penalties, some departments may not take the requirement seriously.
Requiring reports does not actually restrict how police use automated license plate readers or prevent privacy violations. It only documents current practices without requiring changes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.