Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes defense technology cooperation and information sharing between United States and Israel.
The problem
The US and Israel need coordinated frameworks for sharing military technology and defense information to strengthen bilateral security cooperation and address regional threats effectively.
The proposal
Creates official mechanisms for US-Israel defense technology cooperation, including joint development initiatives, technology transfer agreements, and enhanced intelligence and defense information sharing protocols.
The impact
Affects US military personnel, Israeli defense officials, technology companies in both nations, and regional security dynamics in the Middle East.
Enhanced US-Israel cooperation could improve security coordination against shared threats in the Middle East. Closer defense ties may deter adversaries and improve crisis response capabilities.
Joint defense technology development could accelerate innovation in both nations' militaries. Shared research may lead to more advanced capabilities and cost efficiencies through collaborative projects.
Formalizing defense cooperation reinforces a key US partnership in the Middle East. Structured frameworks improve long-term predictability and military interoperability between allied forces.
Defense cooperation can create business opportunities for contractors and technology firms in both nations. Joint projects may generate high-skilled jobs in the defense sector.
Deepened US-Israel military ties could be perceived negatively by other Middle Eastern nations. This may complicate diplomatic efforts and increase tensions in an already volatile region.
Defense technology cooperation and joint development require significant government funding. Taxpayers bear costs for military programs that may not directly address domestic needs.
Defense cooperation agreements often involve classified information and restricted oversight. Public accountability for how technology sharing affects broader foreign policy goals may be limited.
Initial cooperation frameworks could expand beyond original intended scope over time. Ongoing agreements may commit the US to obligations not fully debated by Congress.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
FDD ACTION
via FDD ACTION
…operation of the Golden Dome missile defense system, all provisions. H.R. 10796, United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Act, all provisions. S. 1541, SHIPS for America Act of 2025, all provisions. S. 2722,…
Q3 2026 total
all issues
Firms whose LDA filings mention this bill. One filing covers many bills — read as disclosed interest, not confirmed lobbying on this bill alone. Dollar amounts are each filer's total reported lobbying money for that reporting period across every issue in the filing. No public data breaks lobbying spending out by bill, so none of these figures is the amount spent on this bill.
Verify these filings on the Senate LDA database