Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Expands civil rights protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
The problem
Current federal civil rights laws do not explicitly protect people from discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in housing, employment, and public services.
The proposal
Adds sexual orientation and gender identity as protected categories under existing civil rights laws including Fair Housing Act, Civil Rights Act of 1964, and public accommodation rules.
The impact
LGBTQ+ individuals gain federal anti-discrimination protections in jobs, housing, and services. Religious organizations and some employers may face new compliance requirements and potential legal challenges.
Federal protections would apply equally nationwide. Currently, LGBTQ+ people have different legal protections depending on which state they live in. This creates uniform standards.
Workers could not be fired based on sexual orientation or gender identity. This provides job stability and financial security for millions of Americans in states without existing protections.
Renters and homebuyers cannot face discrimination from landlords or lenders. This expands fair housing rights similar to protections based on race or religion.
Ensures equal access to restaurants, hotels, healthcare, and other public services. Prevents denial of service based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
Religious organizations worry about conflicts between their beliefs and anti-discrimination requirements. They may face legal challenges if employment or service policies differ from the law.
Small employers must update policies, training, and procedures to comply with new rules. Legal uncertainty during implementation may increase compliance expenses.
Terms like 'gender identity' lack uniform legal definitions, creating uncertainty in enforcement. Courts may need years to clarify how rules apply in specific situations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10734
Title IX Take Responsibility Act of 2026
HRES 1493
Declaring unconditional war on racism and invidious discrimination and providing for the establishment of a Cabinet-level Department of Reconciliation charged with eliminating racism and invidious discrimination.
HR 10052
Right to Worship Act
SRES 819
A resolution condemning the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for its ongoing human rights abuses, including its use of politically motivated espionage claims to justify arbitrary detention and executions.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN
via HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN
…H.R. 3243; S. 1663: Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act of 2025 H.R. 15; S. 1503: Equality Act H.R. 2588: Improving Reporting to Prevent Hate Act of 2025 S. Res. 312: A resolution recognizing June 2025 as LGBTQ Pride Month.…
Q2 2025 total
all issues
HADASSAH, THE WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA, INC.
via HADASSAH, THE WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA, INC.
…ing education programs or activities, and for other purposes. H.R. 15/S. 1503 - Equality Act All provisions This bill prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation. H.Res. 352 - Ca…
Q2 2025 total
all issues
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
via AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
…Rights. S. 128-SAVE Act-Issues Lobbied: Voting Rights, LGBTQ Rights. S. 1503-Equality Act-Issues Lobbied: LGBTQ Rights. S. 2164-Algorithmic Accountability Act-Issues Lobbied: Algorithmic Justice. S. 331-HALT Fentanyl Ac…
Q2 2025 total
all issues
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION
via NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION
…rvice Recognition Week and throughout the year. H.R. 15, Equality Act S. 1503, Equality Act H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act of 2025 H.R. 51, Washington, D.C. Admission Act S. 51, Washington, D.C. Admission Act H.R. 107, Return to…
Q2 2025 total
all issues
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
via AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK, INC.
…in cancer prevention, detection, and treatment. Equality Act, H.R. 15/S. 1503. This bill prohibits discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity with respect to businesses, employment, housing, fede…
Q2 2025 total
all issues
Firms whose LDA filings mention this bill. One filing covers many bills — read as disclosed interest, not confirmed lobbying on this bill alone. Dollar amounts are each filer's total reported lobbying money for that reporting period across every issue in the filing. No public data breaks lobbying spending out by bill, so none of these figures is the amount spent on this bill.
Verify these filings on the Senate LDA database