Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to give parents more control over their children's school activities and information.
The problem
Parents report concerns about school decisions regarding their children's activities, health information, and classroom materials without parental notification or consent.
The proposal
The bill would require schools to notify parents about changes to student activities, health matters, and provide parents with greater oversight and decision-making authority in schools.
The impact
Students, parents, teachers, and school administrators would experience changes in how schools handle parental notification policies and student privacy matters.
Parents would have more information about their children's school activities and decisions. This could strengthen family-school communication and allow parents to support their children better at home.
Schools would be required to keep parents informed about significant changes or matters affecting their children. This creates clearer communication between schools and families.
The bill emphasizes parents' legal role in making decisions about their minor children's welfare. This could protect family privacy and parental authority in education.
Schools would face additional paperwork and notification requirements, increasing workload for staff. This could strain already limited school resources and personnel time.
Requiring parental notification before certain school actions might delay time-sensitive decisions affecting student health or safety. Schools may face legal complications in emergency situations.
Broad parental notification requirements could conflict with student privacy rights in some situations. Teenagers may face challenges maintaining confidentiality about sensitive personal matters.
Without specific bill language available, it is unclear what exact activities trigger notification or how schools should implement these requirements. This ambiguity could create compliance challenges.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.