Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill promotes mass timber construction through tax incentives and research funding.
The problem
Mass timber is an underutilized sustainable building material. Current policies and market conditions limit its adoption in the construction industry.
The proposal
The bill likely provides tax credits, grants, or research funding to encourage mass timber use in construction projects and develop the industry.
The impact
Timber companies, construction firms, and builders benefit. Environmental advocates and lumber workers may see opportunities. Government spending increases.
Mass timber is renewable and stores carbon. It can reduce construction's environmental impact compared to steel and concrete, which are carbon-intensive materials.
The bill could create jobs in timber harvesting, manufacturing, and construction. It supports rural economies dependent on forestry.
Research funding accelerates mass timber technology development. This strengthens American competitiveness in green building markets.
Increases demand for American-grown timber products. Reduces reliance on imported materials and supports domestic forestry industries.
Tax credits and grants increase federal costs. This spending must come from taxpayers or add to budget deficits.
Increased timber demand could pressure forests if not managed sustainably. Overharvesting risks harming ecosystems and biodiversity.
Government incentives favor one building material over others. This may artificially advantage mass timber companies rather than letting markets decide.
Mass timber buildings are newer technology with less long-term performance data. Fire safety and structural durability require additional research and testing.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.