Latest action: Under authority of the order of the Senate of September 30, 2026, ordered read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Renews the Dream Act to provide immigration benefits to eligible undocumented young people.
The problem
Undocumented young people brought to the US as children lack legal status, employment authorization, and educational opportunities despite growing up American.
The proposal
The bill would renew protections allowing eligible undocumented youth to obtain work permits, driver's licenses, and pursue education without deportation fear.
The impact
Undocumented young adults gain legal work authorization and stability. Employers access workers. Schools serve more students. Immigration enforcement changes.
Young people can work legally, earn higher wages, pay taxes, and contribute more fully to the economy. This increases overall economic productivity and government tax revenue.
Eligible students can pursue higher education without fear of deportation. This creates opportunity for skill development and career advancement.
Provides stability and legal status to people who have lived most of their lives in America. Reduces uncertainty and fear in immigrant communities.
Employers can hire qualified workers with legal authorization. Reduces exploitation and unfair labor competition from undocumented workers.
Critics argue the bill may incentivize future illegal immigration by offering benefits to undocumented immigrants. This could complicate border enforcement efforts.
Expanded benefits may increase costs for education, healthcare, and social services. Questions exist about funding and fiscal impact on state and local budgets.
Some argue creating work authorization without full citizenship contradicts immigration law. Others believe Congress should address root causes through comprehensive reform.
Legal immigrants who followed proper procedures may view the bill as unfairly rewarding illegal entry. This raises equity questions about immigration policy.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.