Latest action: Under authority of the order of the Senate of September 30, 2026, ordered read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Updates how the federal government manages revenue from lands it owns.
The problem
Current laws governing federal land revenue collection may be outdated and not reflect modern management practices or economic conditions.
The proposal
Modernizes revenue collection and management procedures for federally acquired lands to improve efficiency and financial operations.
The impact
Affects federal agencies, states receiving land revenue sharing, and industries using federal lands like timber, mining, and recreation.
Modernizing revenue systems could help the federal government collect money more efficiently from land use. This may increase funding available for land management and conservation programs.
Updated procedures could lead to more effective management of federal properties. Clearer rules might reduce confusion about how lands should be used and maintained.
States that receive shares of federal land revenue could benefit from more transparent and consistent payment methods. Modernization might ensure states get their fair share more reliably.
Streamlined processes could speed up permit approvals and revenue distributions. Businesses and states might experience fewer delays in their dealings with federal land agencies.
Without knowing exact details, there is risk that modernization could harm certain groups. Changes might reduce revenue sharing with states or increase costs for land users.
Modernized rules could inadvertently benefit mining, timber, or energy companies over conservation. Environmental protections might be weakened if revenue goals become prioritized.
Changes to revenue distribution formulas could result in some states receiving less money. This might reduce funding for state education and infrastructure programs.
If modernization emphasizes revenue, public recreation on federal lands might become more restricted. People could face higher fees or reduced access to national lands.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2024 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.