Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires health insurance companies to make coverage decisions faster.
The problem
Patients may wait too long for health insurance companies to decide if they will pay for medical treatments, causing delays in receiving care.
The proposal
The bill sets time limits for insurance companies to approve or deny coverage requests so patients get answers quickly.
The impact
Patients needing medical care, insurance companies, and doctors are affected by faster decision timelines for treatment coverage.
Patients would get quicker answers about coverage, allowing them to receive medical care without long delays. This could improve health outcomes by reducing wait times for necessary treatments.
Patients and doctors would know faster whether insurance will pay for treatment. This reduces stress and helps patients plan their medical care more effectively.
Clear timelines for decisions would make the insurance process less confusing. Patients would have better communication about their coverage status.
Time limits encourage insurance companies to process requests quickly and efficiently. This could improve overall system performance.
Insurance companies may need more staff to meet strict deadlines. These costs could be passed to consumers through higher premiums.
Very tight deadlines might force insurance companies to make hasty coverage decisions without proper review. This could lead to wrong approvals or denials.
Some medical situations require thorough investigation and expert review. Strict time limits might not work for complicated coverage questions.
If the law increases insurance company costs significantly, they may raise premiums for all customers. This could make insurance less affordable.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.