Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows the Defense Secretary to make agreements with other government agencies to share support services.
The problem
Defense agencies may lack clear authority to enter into informal support agreements with other government entities, creating inefficiencies in resource sharing and coordination.
The proposal
Authorizes the Secretary of Defense to establish intergovernmental support agreements on behalf of Defense Agencies without additional congressional approval for each agreement.
The impact
Defense agencies gain flexibility in coordinating with other federal agencies. Taxpayers may see cost savings or inefficiencies depending on implementation. Other agencies gain potential access to defense resources.
Defense agencies could share facilities, equipment, and services with other federal agencies more easily. This might reduce wasteful duplication and save taxpayer money. Agencies could work together more efficiently.
Agencies wouldn't need to wait for separate congressional approval for each support agreement. This streamlines operations and allows quicker responses to urgent needs. Government could operate more flexibly.
Sharing resources and services between agencies typically reduces overall government expenses. This could save taxpayer money by eliminating duplicate services and infrastructure.
Easier agreements could strengthen relationships and communication between defense and non-defense agencies. Better coordination across government generally improves overall effectiveness.
Congress would have less direct control over defense agreements. This reduces legislative oversight of how defense resources are used. Some view this as problematic for government accountability.
Without clear rules, defense support agreements could conflict with existing laws or policies. Agreements might create unintended consequences or problems not anticipated.
The bill doesn't specify what types of agreements are allowed or what limits apply. Vague authority could allow unexpected or inappropriate arrangements.
Independent agreements might make it harder to track how defense money and resources are actually used. The public and Congress might struggle to understand these arrangements.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.