Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill S 5679 establishes restrictions on military self-dealing and conflicts of interest practices.
The problem
Military personnel and contractors may face conflicts of interest or self-dealing situations that undermine armed forces integrity and proper use of resources.
The proposal
The NO SELF Act creates rules preventing military members and contractors from benefiting personally from their official positions or defense contracts.
The impact
Military personnel, defense contractors, Pentagon officials, and taxpayers are affected through stricter ethical guidelines and potential penalties for violations.
Prevents military officials from using their positions for personal profit. This protects national security resources from being diverted for private gain. Strengthens public trust in defense spending.
Ensures defense contracts and military budgets serve their intended purpose rather than enriching officials. Makes military spending more efficient and accountable.
Clear ethical rules strengthen the armed forces' reputation and internal discipline. Helps maintain focus on national defense rather than personal interests.
Fair competition among contractors when officials cannot favor companies for personal benefit. Ensures best vendors win contracts based on merit.
Military and contractors must invest in monitoring systems, legal review, and training. These administrative costs could increase Pentagon expenses.
Strict rules might deter talented people from military service if they feel overly restricted. Some qualified candidates may choose private sector instead.
Determining what counts as self-dealing can be complicated and subjective. Enforcement may require extensive investigations and litigation.
Without bill text available, it's unclear how broad the restrictions are or what penalties apply. Rules may be too strict or too loose depending on specifics.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.