Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents U.S. aid from going to organizations or countries that support terrorism.
The problem
The U.S. government provides foreign aid to many countries and organizations. Some concerns exist that aid money might reach groups or nations involved in terrorist activities.
The proposal
The bill would require checks to ensure U.S. aid does not go to entities associated with terrorism or terrorist-supporting nations.
The impact
Foreign aid recipients, U.S. government agencies, international organizations, and countries receiving American assistance would be subject to new terrorism-related screening requirements.
Helps ensure U.S. aid dollars do not accidentally fund terrorism or terrorist groups. This can increase public confidence that foreign aid serves legitimate purposes.
Adds oversight mechanisms to foreign aid distribution. Can help prevent unintended consequences of aid programs.
Aligns aid policy with stated U.S. security objectives to counter terrorism globally.
Additional screening requirements could delay getting help to countries in crisis or emergency situations. Bureaucracy may prevent timely humanitarian assistance.
Strict restrictions might prevent aid from reaching civilians in countries labeled as terrorism supporters. People needing food or medical help could be affected.
Defining which organizations support terrorism is complex and subjective. Different agencies might disagree on designations, causing confusion.
Restrictions on aid could strain relationships with partner nations. Countries might feel penalized unfairly if screening criteria are unclear.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.