Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill addresses security risks in U.S. electric grid supply chains.
The problem
Foreign actors may infiltrate critical equipment and components supplying America's electrical power systems, threatening national infrastructure and security.
The proposal
Establishes security requirements and oversight measures for companies supplying parts and equipment to the nation's electric grid.
The impact
Electric utilities, equipment manufacturers, and grid operators must meet new security standards. Consumers may see increased electricity costs. Government gains better oversight.
Protects critical power infrastructure from sabotage and foreign interference. A compromised grid could cause widespread blackouts affecting millions of Americans and essential services like hospitals and water treatment.
Security requirements help prevent hackers from damaging power systems remotely. This protects the reliability and stability of electricity delivery across the country.
May encourage domestic manufacturing of grid equipment and components instead of foreign sourcing. Could create manufacturing and technical jobs in the United States.
Identifies weak points where enemies could insert dangerous components into the grid supply chain. Early detection and prevention saves money compared to fixing attacks after they happen.
New security requirements increase expenses for companies, which often pass costs to customers through higher electricity bills. Low-income families struggle most with rising utility costs.
Small grid equipment suppliers may lack resources to meet complex security standards, forcing them out of business or to merge with larger companies.
Lengthy security compliance processes and paperwork could delay renewable energy projects and grid modernization efforts needed to transition away from fossil fuels.
Bill lacks specific standards, timelines, and enforcement mechanisms. Companies may face confusion about exactly what they must do, leading to inconsistent compliance.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.