Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Rename a New York postal facility after Gunnery Sergeant Ruben Santos.
The problem
A postal facility in Medford, New York lacks an official designation honoring notable service members or community figures.
The proposal
The bill renames the USPS facility at 1905 Route 112 in Medford, New York to the Gunnery Sergeant Ruben Santos Post Office Building.
The impact
Residents of Medford gain a facility named after a recognized individual. The postal service's facility identity changes. No operational or financial effects on most Americans.
Naming the building after a Gunnery Sergeant recognizes military service and sacrifice. This provides public tribute to those who served in the armed forces.
The local Medford community may feel a stronger connection to their postal facility. Named buildings can boost local identity and civic engagement.
Renaming a facility requires minimal government spending. The change mainly involves signage and administrative updates.
Honoring military personnel typically has broad support across political parties. These bills rarely generate partisan disagreement.
Congress spends time on naming bills that could address other policy priorities. Legislative capacity is finite.
A name change does not improve postal services or address operational issues. The practical impact on customers is minimal.
Without context, residents unfamiliar with Gunnery Sergeant Santos may not understand the building's name. The honoree's background is not detailed in the bill.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.