Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal funding for the Clean School Bus Program.
The problem
School buses emit diesel pollution affecting air quality and student health. The program needs renewal to continue replacing older buses with cleaner vehicles.
The proposal
Extends authorization and funding for the Clean School Bus Program, which helps school districts purchase electric or low-emission buses to reduce pollution.
The impact
School districts, students, and communities benefit from cleaner air and reduced diesel emissions. Costs supported through federal funding mechanisms.
Replacing diesel buses with electric or clean-burning alternatives reduces harmful air pollution. Students breathing cleaner air may have fewer respiratory problems and better school attendance.
Fewer emissions help combat air pollution and reduce the transportation sector's climate impact. Communities near schools experience improved air quality over time.
Electric buses have lower fuel and maintenance costs than diesel buses. Schools may save money on operating expenses after initial purchase.
Increased demand for electric buses can boost domestic vehicle production and manufacturing jobs. This strengthens the clean technology industry.
Electric buses are more expensive to purchase initially than traditional buses. Federal funding may not fully cover all districts' needs, creating budget pressure.
Many schools lack charging stations needed for electric buses. Districts must invest in infrastructure upgrades before buses can operate effectively.
Reauthorization requires sustained federal budget allocation. Critics may question whether this spending is the best use of limited government resources.
Rural schools with longer routes and sparse infrastructure face greater challenges using electric buses. Battery range limitations may not meet all transportation needs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.