Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows certain facilities to be built within Federal highway right-of-way areas.
The problem
Current Federal rules may restrict what structures and facilities can be placed in areas next to interstate and Federal highways, limiting development possibilities.
The proposal
The bill changes rules to permit specific facilities to be constructed within the right-of-way on Federal-aid highways, broadening what is allowed.
The impact
Highway departments, businesses, and local governments would gain flexibility to develop facilities near Federal highways. Travelers and communities may see new amenities or services.
Allowing facilities in highway right-of-ways could create new business development opportunities and generate revenue for local communities. Private companies might build rest areas, gas stations, or other services.
Travelers could benefit from improved facilities and services along Federal highways. Rest areas and other amenities could be more conveniently located.
States and local governments gain more flexibility in how they use highway corridors. This allows communities to adapt to changing transportation and development needs.
Adding structures near highways could create hazards for drivers and increase accident risks. Construction activities might also disrupt traffic flow.
Development in highway right-of-ways may harm natural habitats, wetlands, and landscapes. This could conflict with environmental protection laws.
Having multiple facilities in right-of-way areas complicates highway maintenance and repairs. Coordination between highway departments and facility owners becomes more complex.
The bill's scope is unclear on which facilities qualify and how property disputes are handled. This ambiguity could lead to legal conflicts.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.