Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Stops oil and gas drilling in a military training area in the Gulf of Mexico.
The problem
Oil and gas production in the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range may conflict with military testing operations and environmental protection in that area.
The proposal
The bill establishes a moratorium banning new oil and gas production and exploration activities within the Eglin Gulf Test and Training Range.
The impact
Oil and gas companies lose drilling rights in this area. Military operations continue uninterrupted. Environmental protections increase in the Gulf region.
Keeps the training range clear for military testing without interference from oil and gas activities. This ensures the military can safely conduct necessary exercises and weapons testing.
Prevents potential oil spills and pollution in the Gulf of Mexico. Protects marine ecosystems and fish populations in the training range area.
Avoids future environmental cleanup costs and potential litigation. Eliminates conflicts between military and energy operations that could be expensive to manage.
Removes drilling infrastructure that could pose safety risks to military aircraft and vessels training in the area.
Reduces domestic oil and gas supplies available to the U.S. market. May increase reliance on foreign energy sources and affect energy prices.
Oil and gas workers in the Gulf lose employment opportunities. Related industries like drilling services and support operations also lose business.
Loses lease sales and royalty payments from oil companies that would go to federal and state budgets. These funds typically support coastal communities.
Energy companies and their workers will likely oppose the moratorium, potentially creating political conflict and legal challenges to the ban.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.