Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Amends tax code to limit government interference with private and religious schools.
The problem
Concerns that government regulations may interfere with how private and religious schools operate their institutions and make decisions.
The proposal
Modifies Internal Revenue Code provisions to restrict government actions that could affect private and religious school operations, though specific changes are not detailed.
The impact
Private and religious schools, their students, families, and potentially taxpayers through tax policy changes affecting these institutions.
Private and religious schools would have more freedom to operate according to their own principles and values. This protects the ability of families to choose schools aligned with their beliefs.
Safeguards religious institutions' ability to maintain their mission and teachings. Reduces regulatory burden on faith-based educational organizations.
Families seeking alternatives to public schools would face fewer obstacles. Strengthens the ability of parents to direct their children's education.
Reducing government oversight could limit safety and civil rights protections for students. Standards ensuring fair treatment and safe environments might be weakened.
Less government involvement might reduce transparency about how schools operate and use funds. Public understanding of school practices could decrease.
Without specific details, the bill's actual effects are unclear. Courts may face challenges interpreting what 'interference' means in practice.
Changes to tax code could affect government revenue or how tax benefits are distributed. Costs to federal budget are unknown without more details.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.