Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires U.S. citizen students to pass the naturalization test to graduate from certain institutions.
The problem
Some argue citizens lack knowledge of U.S. history, civics, and government. Policymakers want to ensure educational standards include civics competency for all graduates.
The proposal
Amends Higher Education Act to mandate certain colleges require U.S. citizen students to pass the naturalization exam as a graduation requirement.
The impact
U.S. citizen college students would need to pass a civics test. Schools must administer and track test results. International and non-citizen students would likely be exempt.
Graduates would demonstrate basic knowledge of U.S. government, history, and citizenship. This could improve civic engagement and informed voting among young adults.
Creates a uniform civics requirement across institutions. All graduates would meet the same baseline civics knowledge standard.
Students would be better prepared for jury duty, voting, and civic responsibilities. Stronger foundational knowledge supports democratic participation.
Non-citizens and international students are exempted while citizens must pass. This creates different standards based on citizenship status, raising equity concerns.
Students who fail the test may need retesting, delaying graduation. This could increase time-to-degree and associated costs for struggling students.
Schools must implement testing, grading, and remediation systems. This adds costs and workload to colleges already managing complex operations.
Many states already require civics testing for high school graduation. This creates redundant testing without clear added value for college graduates.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.