Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates state grants to help more families access WIC nutrition assistance programs.
The problem
Some families struggle to access WIC benefits due to barriers like application complexity, limited program outreach, or inadequate resources. This limits nutrition support for eligible women, infants, and children.
The proposal
Establishes a federal grant program giving money to states to expand and improve WIC access through better outreach, simplified enrollment, and additional services.
The impact
Low-income families, pregnant women, infants, and young children gain easier access to nutrition assistance. States receive federal funding to strengthen program operations.
Improved WIC access helps pregnant women, infants, and young children get essential nutrients. This can lead to better health outcomes, stronger development, and fewer complications.
Grant funding can simplify application processes and increase outreach efforts. Families who deserve benefits but don't know about them or find applications difficult can more easily participate.
States receive funding to address their unique challenges. Different regions can use grants based on what works best for their communities.
Better nutrition during critical early years supports brain development and school readiness. This investment can have long-term benefits for children's success.
The grant program requires federal funding that adds to government spending. This increases the national budget or requires funds from other programs.
States may struggle to effectively use grants or lack staff to administer new services. Poorly managed programs waste money without improving access.
Without specific metrics or requirements, grants might not achieve meaningful access improvements. The bill lacks details on how success will be measured.
Access grants alone don't address underlying issues like WIC's benefit levels or food quality. Structural problems may persist despite improved enrollment.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.