Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill protects military readiness operations off Florida's coast from regulatory restrictions.
The problem
Federal regulations may limit military training and readiness activities in offshore waters near Florida, potentially affecting national defense capabilities and military preparedness.
The proposal
The bill would establish protections for offshore military readiness operations, likely exempting certain military activities from standard environmental or regulatory oversight in designated areas.
The impact
Military personnel and defense operations gain regulatory flexibility. Coastal communities, environmental groups, and fishing industries may face changes in ocean access and environmental protections.
Allows military forces to conduct necessary training and operations without regulatory delays. This ensures armed forces maintain combat readiness and can respond quickly to national security threats.
Streamlines military permitting processes, potentially lowering expenses for training exercises and deployments. Reduces administrative burdens on Department of Defense operations.
Enables continuous military presence and capability development in strategic offshore areas. Strengthens deterrence and rapid response capabilities.
May increase efficiency and reduce costs for military installations and contractors in Florida. Supports defense industry jobs and spending in the region.
Exempting military operations from environmental regulations could harm marine ecosystems, fish populations, and water quality. Weakens protections for protected species and habitats.
Commercial and recreational fishing operations may lose access to traditional fishing areas or face interference from military activities. Threatens livelihoods of fishermen.
Military exemptions may limit public information about offshore operations and environmental monitoring. Reduces community input on activities affecting local waters.
Residents may experience increased noise, activity, or restrictions on beach and water access. Local tourism and quality of life could be affected.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.