Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prohibits federal officials from accepting improper gifts or gratuities that could influence their decisions.
The problem
Federal officials may accept gifts or payments that create conflicts of interest or appear to influence their official duties and decisions.
The proposal
The bill establishes or strengthens rules preventing federal employees and officials from accepting gratuities, gifts, or benefits that could compromise their impartiality.
The impact
Federal employees, officials, and people doing business with government agencies face stricter rules about gift-giving and receiving.
Stricter rules about gifts make it harder for officials to be influenced by special interests. This helps ensure government decisions are based on merit rather than personal benefit.
Clear anti-corruption rules show citizens that government is working fairly. People are more likely to trust government when they know officials cannot be swayed by gifts.
Preventing gratuities protects the reputation of federal agencies and officials. It demonstrates commitment to ethical conduct across government.
Businesses and citizens cannot gain unfair advantages through gifts to officials. Everyone receives fair treatment based on merit.
Without seeing the bill text, it's unclear what counts as a prohibited 'gratuity.' Vague definitions could create confusion or unintended restrictions on normal business interactions.
Monitoring and enforcing gift rules across all federal agencies requires significant resources. Investigators must determine intent and value, which can be difficult.
Strict rules might prevent normal professional courtesies or working relationships between government and business. Some legitimate interactions could be discouraged.
Overly broad rules could restrict innocent activities like accepting coffee or modest meals. Officials might face penalties for minor, harmless gestures.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.