Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents American investors from putting money into Chinese military companies.
The problem
U.S. investors may unknowingly fund Chinese military companies, raising national security concerns about American capital supporting potential adversaries.
The proposal
Restricts or prohibits U.S. investors from investing in Chinese companies linked to military activities, requiring identification and blocking of such investments.
The impact
Affects U.S. investors, investment firms, Chinese companies with military ties, and financial markets; limits investment options while aiming to protect national security.
Prevents American money from funding Chinese military development or modernization. Reduces financial support flowing to potential military competitors.
Forces transparency about which companies have military connections. Helps investors make informed decisions about where their money goes.
Matches existing U.S. restrictions on defense-related technology exports to China. Creates consistency across different policy areas.
Blocks funding that could support companies developing military technology with civilian applications. Limits resources available for weapons advancement.
American investors lose access to Chinese companies and markets. Reduces profit potential for investment portfolios and retirement accounts.
Some Chinese companies blur lines between civilian and military purposes. Creates enforcement challenges and legal uncertainty about which companies qualify.
China might restrict American companies investing there or limit U.S. business access. Could harm American businesses with Chinese operations.
Investment firms must spend money and time identifying affected companies. Creates compliance costs that may be passed to investors.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.