Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Provides financial support to help rural hospitals maintain surgical services and keep surgeons.
The problem
Rural hospitals struggle to afford surgical programs and retain surgeons, limiting emergency care access for rural communities.
The proposal
Establishes funding mechanisms and incentives to support surgical services in rural hospitals and attract surgeons to underserved areas.
The impact
Rural hospitals and surgical staff benefit from funding support. Rural residents gain better access to emergency surgical care.
Rural patients currently travel long distances for emergency surgery. Better surgical services in rural hospitals reduce travel time and improve survival rates for time-sensitive emergencies.
Financial incentives help attract and retain surgeons in rural areas. This addresses physician shortages that limit rural hospital capabilities.
Funding support helps rural hospitals maintain financial viability. Stronger hospitals support local employment and community economic health.
Sustained surgical programs ensure rural hospitals can handle trauma and acute surgical emergencies. This protects public health in underserved regions.
The bill creates new federal funding obligations for rural surgical programs. Ongoing costs could strain federal budgets or require tax increases.
Without an official summary, specific funding amounts and eligibility requirements are unknown. This makes it hard to assess true costs and fairness.
Rural areas face shortages in multiple specialties, not just surgery. Money spent on surgery might be needed elsewhere in rural healthcare.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.