Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Expands the 9-8-8 suicide crisis hotline workforce through federal funding and training support.
The problem
The 9-8-8 suicide and crisis lifeline needs more trained workers to handle increasing call volume and provide adequate support to people in crisis.
The proposal
The bill provides federal funding to hire, train, and support workers for the 9-8-8 crisis response system across states and organizations.
The impact
Crisis hotline centers, mental health workers, and people experiencing suicidal crises benefit from better staffing and faster response times to emergency calls.
More trained workers mean shorter wait times and better support for people calling the crisis line. This can help save lives by providing immediate help when someone needs it most.
The bill creates new jobs for crisis counselors and mental health workers. This increases employment opportunities in the mental health field.
Investing in crisis response improves the overall mental health system. More trained workers mean better care and support across communities.
The 9-8-8 line provides immediate help to people thinking about suicide. More workers and better funding can prevent deaths and help people in their darkest moments.
The bill costs federal money that comes from taxpayers. Critics argue the government should limit spending or find other ways to fund this service.
It is unclear how the program will be funded long-term after initial federal money runs out. States may struggle to maintain staffing levels without ongoing support.
Crisis hotline workers deal with traumatic situations daily and suffer high burnout rates. Simply hiring more workers without addressing workplace conditions could lead to staff turnover.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.