Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill restricts federal investment in fossil fuel companies and promotes clean energy financing.
The problem
Federal investments and financing may support fossil fuel industries while climate change accelerates. Some believe government money should fund cleaner energy alternatives instead.
The proposal
The bill likely limits federal loans, guarantees, and investments going to coal, oil, and gas companies, redirecting resources toward renewable energy projects.
The impact
Fossil fuel companies face reduced federal funding. Renewable energy industries gain access to more federal money. Workers and communities dependent on fossil fuels are affected.
Redirecting federal money to renewable energy can help solar, wind, and battery companies expand. This may create new jobs in growing industries.
Fossil fuel industries face long-term decline as renewable energy becomes cheaper. Shifting investments may protect taxpayer money from stranded assets.
Reducing federal support for oil, coal, and gas aligns with climate goals. This uses government spending to influence emissions reduction.
Renewable energy reduces reliance on imported oil. This strengthens national energy security over time.
Coal miners, oil workers, and related industries could lose federal support and employment. Communities built around these industries face economic hardship.
Reducing fossil fuel investment may raise energy prices in the short term. Families and businesses could pay more for electricity and fuel.
Defining which companies count as fossil fuel companies may be complicated. Existing contracts and commitments could create legal disputes.
Other countries may not follow similar policies, meaning global fossil fuel investment continues. This limits the bill's effectiveness.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.