Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires transparency and reporting requirements for GameStop stock trading activities.
The problem
Lack of public information about significant GameStop stock transactions and trading patterns may obscure market activity and investor impacts.
The proposal
Establishes reporting requirements for GameStop-related trades, possibly creating disclosure rules for large transactions or trading activities.
The impact
Affects GameStop investors, traders, institutional investors, and market regulators who would need to comply with or benefit from new transparency rules.
Requiring disclosure of GameStop trading activity could help all investors make informed decisions. Transparency typically reduces opportunities for unfair trading practices and helps people understand what's happening in the market.
Clear reporting rules may protect individual investors by revealing large trades or unusual activity early. This allows small investors to understand major market moves affecting their investments.
Gives financial regulators better tools to monitor and prevent market manipulation. Enhanced oversight can help maintain fair and orderly financial markets.
New reporting requirements create costs for brokerage firms and traders to implement systems and processes. These costs may be passed along to customers through fees.
Increased disclosure requirements might reveal personal investment information about individual traders and investors. Some may view this as an invasion of financial privacy.
U.S. traders and firms might face disadvantages compared to international competitors with fewer reporting requirements. This could push trading activity to less-regulated markets.
Without full bill text, it's unclear how specific transparency requirements would work. Poorly designed rules could create confusion without achieving transparency goals.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.