Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill encourages multigenerational housing through tax incentives and regulatory changes.
The problem
Rising housing costs make it difficult for families to afford separate homes. Some families want to live together across generations for financial and social reasons.
The proposal
Creates tax benefits and removes regulations to make it easier for families to build or modify homes for multigenerational living situations.
The impact
Families may save money on housing. Homeowners could get tax breaks. Zoning rules might change in some areas. Builders and lenders would adapt to new options.
Tax incentives could help families afford to build multigenerational homes. Sharing housing expenses reduces costs per household. This especially helps younger adults and elderly people on fixed incomes.
Multigenerational homes allow families to care for elderly relatives without moving to assisted living. This keeps families together and can reduce healthcare costs. Grandparents stay active in family life.
Removes zoning barriers that prevent adding units to properties. Creates new ways to build homes. Increases housing supply in tight markets.
Living together increases daily interaction between generations. Provides built-in childcare and eldercare support. Creates stronger community ties.
More people per property could strain neighborhood infrastructure. Parking and street use may increase in residential areas. Some communities may not support density changes.
Local residents often resist changes to neighborhood character. This could lead to conflicts between newcomers and existing residents. Implementation may be slow and difficult.
Wealthy families better positioned to build new multigenerational homes. Low-income renters may not benefit from tax incentives. Could increase wealth inequality in housing.
Multigenerational living requires significant compromise and cooperation. Privacy concerns may create household tension. Not suitable for all family situations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.