Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a civilian climate jobs program to hire Americans for environmental and conservation work.
The problem
Climate change threatens communities. Many young and disadvantaged Americans lack good job opportunities. Environmental projects need workers.
The proposal
Establishes a Civilian Climate Corps program that employs Americans in climate resilience, conservation, and environmental restoration projects nationwide.
The impact
Young people and disadvantaged communities gain job training and employment. Employers access workers. Environment benefits from conservation work.
Creates employment opportunities for young adults and disadvantaged communities. Provides paid work, training, and career pathways in growing environmental sectors. Addresses unemployment in underserved regions.
Funds conservation projects, forest management, and ecosystem restoration. Addresses climate change impacts through direct environmental work. Improves public lands and natural resources.
Directs resources to communities facing climate risks and economic hardship. Promotes equity by targeting disadvantaged populations. Strengthens local economies and resilience.
Provides training and skills in clean energy and conservation fields. Creates pathways to permanent careers. Builds workforce for future green economy.
Program requires significant federal funding. Critics argue costs could increase deficit. Budget impact depends on program scope and duration.
Large new government program faces execution risks. Coordination across agencies and regions may be difficult. Quality and effectiveness of jobs uncertain.
Government-funded program may compete with private employers for workers. Some businesses may face labor market changes. Long-term effects on private environmental companies unclear.
Long-term funding and continuation uncertain depending on future budgets. Job permanence depends on continued appropriations. Participants may face employment gaps after program ends.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.