Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Increases federal funding for security improvements at nonprofit organizations.
The problem
Nonprofits face security threats but lack resources for protective measures. Federal grants help nonprofits strengthen physical security and emergency preparedness.
The proposal
Expands or improves the Nonprofit Security Grant Program to provide more funding dollars to eligible nonprofits for security upgrades and safety measures.
The impact
Nonprofits, religious institutions, and community organizations receive federal money for security improvements. Communities gain safer gathering spaces.
Nonprofits can upgrade security systems, hire security staff, and improve building safety. This protects vulnerable populations who use these facilities for services and community activities.
The program helps organizations that typically lack large budgets for security. Federal grants reduce the burden on nonprofits and donors to fund expensive security measures.
Funding supports emergency planning, training, and technology to prevent and respond to security incidents. This improves organizational readiness for various emergency situations.
Enhanced security measures may help nonprofit organizations maintain community confidence. Better safety can encourage continued public participation and donations.
Expanded grant funding requires government spending and budget allocation. This money comes from taxpayers or may increase federal deficit spending.
The bill summary lacks specifics on funding amounts, eligible organizations, or implementation details. This makes it hard to assess true costs and program scope.
Grant programs require application processes, compliance monitoring, and administrative oversight. This can create paperwork burdens for nonprofits seeking funding.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.