Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents immigration enforcement actions from occurring at child care facilities.
The problem
Immigration enforcement at child care facilities may disrupt children's care, separate families, and create fear in communities relying on these services.
The proposal
Bill prohibits immigration authorities from conducting enforcement actions inside child care facilities, including arrests and investigations.
The impact
Affects immigrants, child care providers, children in care, and immigration enforcement agencies. Changes where immigration enforcement can operate.
Enforcement actions at child care facilities can disrupt care, frighten children, and separate them from caregivers. Preventing this protects vulnerable children during important developmental time.
Parents may avoid using child care services if they fear enforcement raids. This bill lets families access needed services without that fear.
Child care providers need stable operations and families who feel safe. This protects the workforce and businesses in the child care sector.
The bill doesn't stop immigration enforcement—it just moves it away from child care sites, allowing agencies to pursue enforcement in other locations.
Immigration authorities lose one location where they can conduct enforcement, potentially making their jobs harder and reducing enforcement flexibility.
People subject to immigration enforcement could use child care facilities as safe spaces, potentially avoiding detection or removal.
Defining what counts as a 'child care facility' and monitoring compliance could be difficult and costly for both agencies and businesses.
The bill as described doesn't specify what happens if enforcement actions occur anyway, making enforcement of this restriction unclear.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.